Sotto’s tears and Bishop Socrates’ ersatz activism
BY PET MELLIZA/The Beekeeper
When we were consultant of one daily in W. Visayas
(defunct now) in 1996, senators Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and Tito Sotto III told
us in one briefing they were “verifying the groundswell” of support for their
tandem, with Gloria for president and Sotto vice president in the 1998
elections.
The supposed groundswell went pfffttt. Gloria settled for
vice president, Sotto reelection after stories unflattering to them spread.
Gloria got linked with a big time gambling lord, Sotto
with a drug lord for benefactors.
And, a misfortune to Filipinos, both won in 1998.
Sotto is now senator after heading the Dangerous Drugs
Board 2008 – 2010. He made a name for himself last August 14 when he delivered
a privileged speech in “turno en contra” opposing the RH Bill.
He appeared a new man, a contrite one even, and thus, fit
to run for vice president in 2016 had not for the discovery that he shed only
crocodile tears for his five month-old son whose death he blamed on Diane, the
pill.
His delivery befitted his name as actor-senator: he
exposed himself unfit for public office much less a seat in the Senate which
demanded intellectual honesty as basic virtue.
The entire country watched him delivered a speech
consisting of sentences and entire paragraphs lifted en toto from the blog of Sarah Pope who called herself
“healthy home economist”.
The
blog “Filipino freethinkers” in the article “Bad Father or Evil
Politician: Did Sotto lie about his son’s death?” wonders why Sotto
speaks out only now when he has all the opportunity and resources to pin down
his son’s supposed killer the past 37 years.
His son died in 1975. Sotto
in his August 14 speech identified the pill as “Diane” that turned out to have
been introduced in the market in 1978, three years after his son’s death.
Filipinofreethinkers.org
notes that Sotto was already a TV host in 1975, he became vice mayor of Quezon
City in 1988, senator in 1992 and head of the Dangerous Drugs Board in 2008. He
had all the opportunity and means to slap charges against the company that
produced Diane, campaign against it in the market, or restrict access to it,
which he did not.
“Eat Bulaga”, a top rated
show that Sotto co-hosted, could have done much to vilify Diane out of the
market.
Sarah Pope, author of the
piece that Sotto plagiarized, was too embarrassed that she apologized
that her article was used and twisted by Sotto to suit his anti-RH Bill
stand. Pope was neither against the bill nor the pill.
Sotto is entitled to grieve
for his son but not to disinform us on circumstances surrounding his misfortune
just as one prelate named Socrates Villegas shouldn’t expect hallelujahs from us
for his midnight conversion from spiritual adviser of a thieving clique to
anti-corruption, human rights activist, even.
Socrates, favorite bishop of
a woman named Gloria, wife of one Mike, held his peace while their clique
robbed the nation blind both in cash and human rights, 2001 - 2010.
During the anti-RH Bill
rally, Socrates rallied his crowd against corruption claiming that the RH Bill
would promote government shenanigans because taxes were spent for
contraceptives and condoms instead of medicines and food to feed the poor.
The country, writes the Philippine
Obstetrical and Gynocological Society in its blog URLhttp://www.pogsinc.org/,
ranks 48th in maternal mortality (mothers dying during
pregnancy or 42 days after delivery), at 230 in every 100,000 live
births.
In contrast, Thailands has 110 , Malaysia 62 and
Singapore 14 as the UN says. The Philippine MDG hopes to
bring that down to 55-60 by 2015.
The RH Bill, intended to empower women and giving them access to
information and health care, with the goal of increasing child survival and
reducing maternal deaths, still hangs in limbo, and with it, the target to
bring down maternal death to 55-60 three years from now.
Pass the RH Bill now!
Comments
Post a Comment